Site search
sponsored by
 
Welcome, Guest  avatar

Please enter the following information:

Email:
Password:
  Remember Me
 
  Forgot Password?
  Become a Member
  Close Window
Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Jobs
Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Real Estate
Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Classifieds
Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Search for homes by MLS, classified listings, rentals, and much more!

Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Home  >   > 
<< back
Thursday, January 10, 2008

Federal mandate comes at inopportune time



Print Comment
We should probably feel safer now that the Nevada Board of Examiners has agreed to spend $29.2 million to comply with the federal Real ID Act.

But we're too busy computing all of the things the state could have done with that money, like building highways or funding schools, for example.

The money will pay for drivers licenses that will be more difficult to counterfeit. We're supportive of the federal government's efforts, but if it's that important they should have funded the cost of the program rather than leaving it up to cash-strapped states to deal with.

What's worse is the new system will mean Nevada drivers will have to find birth certificates and other documents and show up in person to renew their license.

And when we hear the licenses will be made in a "secure, central location" instead of at the DMV office, what we are actually hearing is that we'll be waiting longer and spending more.

In 2007, Nevada officials voted to fund Real ID at minimal levels in hopes they could convince Congress to either scale back the requirements or pay for implementation. Apparently, based on the announcement of the $29.2 million contract, they were unsuccessful.

And it couldn't have come at a worse time.



&#149; This editorial represents the view of the Nevada Appeal Editorial Board.


Print del.icio.us digg reddit
Other Top Items
Related Articles
Most Recommended Articles
downloading content
Comments
About Us | Staff | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Swift Communications