Site search
sponsored by
Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
 
Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Welcome, Guest  avatar

Please enter the following information:

Email or Screen Name:
Password:
  Remember Me
 
  Forgot Password?
  Didn't receive your verification email?
  Become a Member
Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Jobs
Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Real Estate
Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Classifieds
Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Search for homes by MLS, classified listings, rentals, and much more!

Nevada Appeal ~ Carson City News, Housing and more
Home  >   > 
<< back
Sunday, August 31, 2008

Reader says euthanization of bear in Carson City was unnecessary



Print Comment
At about 3 p.m. on Wednesday, I was five feet away from a wild black bear. I locked eyes with this magnificent creature and for me time stopped. It was the ultimate poem unwritten and most beautiful song unsung. And in one word, WOW!

He did not attack me or my 4-year-old niece Jia bella. I felt confident this was not a possibility. I also felt confident the officials of our state would not harm this animal. I was wrong. This bear has been down to our local cities twice and has never hurt a single soul or thing.

They always returned him deep into the wild. However for some reason he came back. I had the honor to be graced with his presence and he was tortured in front of me. He ran up the tallest tree in my neighbor's vacant yard as soon as a man hopped our fence to get closer to him. The bear had made it almost to the very top of the tree when a tranquilizer gun was handed to the man. After the first shot, 10 minutes went by and then the travesty occurred. When an uncountable amount of tranquilizers were fired into the animal, a few minutes later the bear fell about two stories from the tree and hit the ground so hard that it made an echo.

The officials around me told me that he would just bounce right off the ground and that he would be OK. I watched in shock as he fell and literally bounced off the ground with no reflex and didn't get back up. He lifted his head once and I felt as though he was looking at me for help, it was as if he was asking me why? After they hauled him away, I found out that they were going to euthanize him all along.

I am appalled with the inhumanity that occurred on that day. There is nothing I wouldn't do to help any animal in need. Everyone says he could have killed you, but I say he could have but he didn't even try.

I feel as though I should have done something more. They wrote that he was a nuisance for coming into our city to justify what they did and then tried to make themselves sound better by saying we release more bears than we euthanize. Correct me if I am wrong, but animals were here before we were and now that their food supply has been shortened and the skies are thick with smoke from fires in different states, how do we have the nerve to call him a nuisance? The professionals who made these decisions, need to be reassessed and evaluated.

I won't be able to live with myself if I don't attempt to make a change on behalf of the bear that died with no justification. Animal cruelty has become a decision for amusement purposes. I can't stop all of it but maybe this time you can help me leave a dent.
WILDLIFE MANAGERS MUST MAKE HARD DECISIONS TO PROTECT PEOPLE
Editor’s note: We asked the Nevada Department of Wildlife to provide information on how it manages the state’s bear population and the criteria it uses in determining what to do with problem bears. The following information was provided by Kelly Clark, conservation education chief for the agency.

Keeping Nevada’s bears wild: As wildlife managers, we deeply regret situations in which wildlife must be euthanized as a result of conflicts caused by humans. However, we also have a responsibility to protect human safety. Bears that have been involved in multiple nuisance situations invariably get into trouble again, and are likely to become emboldened in attempts to secure human foods. Bears of this type can be dangerous to humans: they have none of their natural fear mechanisms, and often refuse to leave when humans are present.
Educating humans about bears and garbage: The Department of Wildlife is encouraging cities and counties in Northern Nevada to pass ordinances that control access to bear-attracting garbage in neighborhoods along the Sierra Front, and prohibit feeding of wildlife. The Department also is working with local governments to develop effective educational materials to inform the public about what they can do to prevent bear problems. Currently, Incline Village and Douglas County have adopted ordinances to require use of bear proof garbage bins in certain situations. We understand that Carson City's City Manager is also considering such an ordinance. These type of ordinances, together with educational efforts for humans to contain garbage, are required if we are ever going to resolve the problem of nuisance bears.
We hope that you will join in our efforts to keep wildlife wild by doing the following:
• Do not feed bears in any manner
• Control your garbage by using bear-proof garbage containers
• Do not put garbage out until the morning of pick up
• Use Pinesol or other ammonia-based products to keep bears from entering windows or porch areas, or from accessing garbage areas
• Talk to neighbors and encourage these same actions in them
• Exclude access to fruit trees, fish ponds, or compost piles
• Do not support supplemental feeding: these activities encourage bears and other wildlife to gather unnaturally, potentially increasing cub mortality, disease transmission, and fertility.

Bear conflicts are on the increase across the West: Across the West, the number of human-bear conflicts has increased. Although there have been no known black bear attacks in Nevada, the number of habituated bears and increased number of human-wildlife conflicts along the Sierra Front has elevated the seriousness of the threat. So far this year, there have been 21 bear mortalities; of those 14 were for public safety reasons, and seven were due to bears being struck by cars.
Why no relocation: Studies have shown that relocation efforts do not work. Bears that are relocated will return to their area of capture or are killed by cars in the process.
For more information, please review our Keep Me Wild information at www.ndow.org.



facebook Print
Ads by Google
Comments
Previous Guide Line
Next Guide Line
Sort comments by:
About Us | Staff | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Swift Communications