Sandoval, Republican governors worry about GOP health plan
Some governors, including Republicans, are unhappy with a GOP proposal to replace former President Barack Obama’s health care law and say they will work on their own legislation to compete with the House bill introduced Monday. A sampling of their comments:
“We want to make sure that we continue to be a state where virtually everybody is covered and people feel they have the access they need and the coverage they need to stay healthy.” — Gov. Charlie Baker, Massachusetts, Republican.
“It’s important that in the health care reform that the federal government is looking at that they don’t leave the states holding the bag.” — Gov. Roy Cooper, North Carolina, Democrat.
“It’s a pretty significant shift and my first blush read is Illinois won’t do very well under the changes they’re recommending, which is a big concern to me. I want to make sure that people in Illinois are not left in the lurch or that there’s a lot of pressure to reduce insurance coverage for people in Illinois. I’m very concerned about that.” — Gov. Bruce Rauner, Illinois, Republican.
“I will do everything in my power to oppose Trumpcare, which benefits millionaires at the expense of hardworking Rhode Islanders and would destroy our progress to provide affordable, quality health care to almost all of our people.” — Gov. Gina Raimondo, Rhode Island, Democrat.
The proposal “is an important first step to lower costs and increase choices for Americans in need of health care.” — Gov. Scott Walker, Wisconsin, Republican.
“This proposal simply shifts costs to those who can least afford it. It would also make our state’s budget challenges even worse.” — Gov. John Carney, Delaware, Democrat.
“We’ve said all along, ‘Work with the governors,’ that it should be a governor-led effort ... Well, they came out with their own bill, which doesn’t include anything that the governors have talked about.” — Gov. Brian Sandoval, Nevada, Republican.
“I would have liked to have seen more flexibility being given to the states.” — Gov. Asa Hutchinson, Arkansas, Republican.
“The proposal put forth by Congressional Republicans will hurt low-income people, the elderly, people with disabilities and those who need long-term care. This means loss of coverage for people with cancer, diabetes and seniors who are already struggling with costs. These are not scare stories, these are facts.” — Gov. Jay Inslee, Washington, Democrat.
“This is a work in progress. There are many competing interests, particularly between states with and without expanded Medicaid. I don’t believe there is a national solution to this conundrum. Rather, we must empower states with the control and flexibility needed to innovate new solutions that address lowering the actual costs of care.” — Gov. Doug Burgum, North Dakota, Republican.
Republican governors complain that a GOP proposal to replace former President Barack Obama’s health care law would force millions of lower-income earners off insurance rolls or stick states with the cost of keeping them covered.
Governors, especially those from political battleground states, were generally cool to the bill put forth in the Republican-controlled U.S. House. Some signaled that they would continue working on their own legislation to compete with the measure introduced Monday.
“We’ve said all along, ‘Work with the governors,’ that it should be a governor-led effort and for the Congress to rely on the governors,” Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval said Tuesday. “Well, they came out with their own bill, which doesn’t include anything that the governors have talked about.”
Republican governors lead 33 states, across all regions, and represent states pivotal to President Donald Trump’s victory in November, including much of the upper Midwest. Their role in the health care debate could influence the biggest public policy changes this year and help determine the party’s future.
At the heart of their criticisms is that the House plan would jeopardize coverage for roughly 11 million people covered through the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion. The law allowed states to expand Medicaid to cover more low-income individuals and their families at costs borne largely by the federal government.
Phasing out the federal supplement for Medicaid would hit hardest in states where governors chose to participate in the expansion, such as Michigan, Nevada and Ohio. The House bill’s provision to shift the federal Medicaid commitment to those states would shrink the number of people eligible for coverage and require states to drop people from coverage or risk incurring huge costs rapidly to keep them enrolled.
“Phasing out Medicaid coverage without a viable alternative is counterproductive and unnecessarily puts at risk our ability to treat the drug-addicted, mentally ill and working poor who now have access to a stable source of care,” said Gov. John Kasich of Ohio.
Michigan, Nevada and Ohio alone have added a combined 2 million to Medicaid’s enrollment since that part of the law took effect in 2014.
The GOP governors expressed some of the same reservations as Democratic governors in states that expanded Medicaid, fretting about higher costs and fewer people covered.
West Virginia Gov. Jim Justice, a Democrat, warned against any health measure that kicks residents off Medicaid and leaves them “in the cold.” The state has been carried by Republican presidential nominees for the past five elections and has added 175,000 residents to Medicaid coverage.
Another problem some Republican governors see with the bill is in converting Medicaid coverage from an open-ended federal entitlement to one that operates under a per-capita cap. A cap would not account, for instance, for rapidly rising drug costs, a big part of a state’s Medicaid budget. GOP governors have suggested that any change in the law should give them more autonomy to account for such changes.
Like other GOP governors, Maine Gov. Paul LePage wants Congress to allow states to broadly rewrite Medicaid rules to allow, for example, work requirements and a personal financial stake in the coverage.
“The only way you will truly repeal and replace — and reform — Obamacare is if you act with as much boldness as those who created it,” LePage said.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker echoed the more muted response from his peers, calling the House bill “an important first step.”
“We will continue working with the Trump administration, the Congress and governors across the country, as we seek a personalized, patient-centered plan that treats people as humans and not like numbers,” he added.
Walker, as chairman of the Republican Governors Association, has been working with governors such as Kasich to draft a proposal that would effectively put states in charge of their Medicaid programs but require the federal government to continue financing them.
The governors’ alternative could become a viable measure in the legislative debate, should it gain Senate sponsorship. The governors working on it have met with senators and staff on the Senate Finance Committee.
Ohio Sen. Rob Portman is already sounding some of Kasich’s concerns. In a letter sent Monday to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Portman wrote that House legislation “does not provide stability and certainty for individuals and families in Medicaid expansion programs or the necessary flexibility for states.”