Letter sent to Nevada Appeal on "Restore America Plan" | NevadaAppeal.com

Letter sent to Nevada Appeal on "Restore America Plan"

Dear Concerned Press at Nevada Appeal:

I am sure that you are all dedicated to reporting your local news with absolute honesty and that you endeavor to inform your readers of the truth of what is happening in the world around them. Assuming this is true, I feel it necessary to give you some more information about what is really happening with your state capitol.

Please understand that the title of the article, “Capitol locked down in wake of threats” is inaccurate in precise representation of the truth. It is true that the capitol was locked down because of “letters” sent to the governor. However, the “letter” received by all 50 governors is actually a Declaration from a lawful Grand Jury of 26 people in each state which is endeavoring to re-establish the true Republic in a peaceful and lawful manner. It does not represent a “threat” from an “extremist” (as is commonly associated with “terrorist” in the media today) group but instead it is a real, legally binding document which is presented by a Grand Jury of regular people which declares that the governor, lieutenant governor, secretary of state, controller and treasurer all must have lawful oaths of office in order operate in their respective positions. The bonds which they all operate under have been effectively seized and noticed to be null and void. The package includes the following; Declaration, Warrants, Orders to the Governors, General orders to the military. It is not a threat, it is a truth that must be complied with or there will be consequences, not of violence, but legal recourse.

There is much to learn and understand about what is contained in the package that was received at the Capitol on Monday. I have included some sources below to help you understand who and what is behind the lock down. Please do the right thing by investigatin thoroughly what is happening and do not just listen to one party. Misinformation is rampant in our country. Please do not make yourselves a part of the problem.

A De Jure Grand jury made up of 26 Nevada Republic citizens are committed to re-establishing a De Jure government in your state please investigate the veracity of what they are going to do. It is a news story in progress and there will be more odd things happening in your Capitol…

What is happening is a peaceful effort to restore America to its rightful state. I am sure many in your state will be happy to hear the good news. Be the first to give it to them.


D Merlin Campbell



Front Page


– Ending foreclosure and bank collection actions immediately (our

first and seventh directives)

– Ending tax prosecutions immediately (second and sixth directives)

– Ending invasions, prosecutions and detentions for fictitious crimes

against the state that lack an injured party other than insurrection,

treason and frauds against the United States (third and eighth


– Ending molestation on the byways (fourth and ninth directives)

– Production of sovereign identification and passports that do not

proclaim subject-class citizenship (fourth and ninth directives)

– Restoration of the trappings of proper de jure governance (fifth and

tenth directives)

– Restoration of the common law of the Land (third and eighth directives)

– Reigning in of the admiralty color-of-law venue to the high seas

(third and eighth directives)

– Restoration of the proper de jure judicial institutions such as the

district court of the United States and the one supreme Court as

constructed and restrained in the Constitution for the United States

of America, c. 1787 (Phase 2, thirteenth through fifteenth directives)

– Re-absorption of the de facto judicial aberrations such as USDC into

the de jure institutions (Phase 2, thirteenth through fifteenth



CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS beginning with voiding of the Downes v.

Bidwell monstrosity (Phase 2, eighteenth directive)

– Arrest and shackling of the District Court of the District of

Columbia (Phase 2, sixteenth directive)

– Recognition of sovereign status in the police databanks of the land

(fourth and ninth directives)

– A lawful and orderly removal of the corporate state as the ruler of

every aspect of your life.

All to be accomplished – with your help – BEHIND THE SCENES, lawfully,

peacefully, without violence and without risking civil war.


(can be reviewed in less than 30 minutes).

Please Goggle or use the included links:

– “28 USC 3002” (definition of the United States as a Federal

corporation never taught in civics class; go to paragraph 15)

(http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/uscode28/usc_sec_28_00003002—-000-.html )

– “27 CFR 72.11” (U.S. Inc. defines all crime as commercial as a

result of the fall of the republic when the South walked out of

congress in 1861 and the de jure congress, unable to raise a quorum,

was replaced by Lincoln with the de facto corporate Congress; and the

de jure district court of the United States was replaced by the de


(http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_98/27cfr72_98.html )

– “Executive Order 6102” (government’s confiscation of your family’s

gold and wealth under threat of 10 years in prison for failure to

comply. As the Order specifies U.S. “persons” (eg. JOHN SMITH and

JANE DOE), law enforcement was duped into enforcing against the

general public a command that only applied to Federal employees and

members of the armed forces.)

(http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=14611 or

http://www.the-privateer.com/1933-gold-confiscation.html )

– “HJR 192” (outlawing of the simple act of “paying with money” as a

felony by substituting the lawyer’s parlor trick of “discharging”

debts) (http://www.truthsetsusfree.com/HJR192.htm or


– “Congressman Louis McFadden speech” (indictment of the Secretary of

the Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board of Governor’s for treason

by the chairman of the House Banking and Currency committee in 1934.

In scathing speeches to Congress, McFadden said: “(The Fed) has

impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has

bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government.”

This most knowledgeable man on banking also explained in vivid detail

the method for recruiting the Federal Reserve to pay our debts as

holder of the gold, and which is at the heart of today’s “tax

remedies.”) (http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/7006/mcfadden-frb.html

or http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Senate/3616/flaherty10.html

and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_T._McFadden)

– “Lewis v. United States 680” (Federal Reserve Bank is privately

owned: “…we conclude that the Reserve Banks are not federal

instrumentalities for purposes of the FTCA (Federal Tort Claims Act),

but are independent, privately owned and locally controlled

corporations.” Lewis v United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (9th Cir. 1982).

In other words, the Fed enjoys no United States immunity from law suit

because it is a Federal institution in name only.

(http://nesara.org/court_summaries/lewis_v_united_states.htm and


– “Modern Money Mechanics” (The Fed’s concise operational manual

showing how money AND INTENTIONAL INFLATION are created from thin air

by the Fed and it’s member banks. The manual is very clear as to the

power of created inflation to speed the process of confiscating your

wealth. The section: “Who Creates Money?” and the final paragraph in

“Bank Deposits – How They Expand or Contract” are worth extra

attention.) (www.rayservers.com/images/ModernMoneyMechanics.pdf or

http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Modern_Money_Mechanics/Introduction )

– “Grace Commission” (Confirmed that virtually ALL taxes actually go

to the Federal Reserve Bank to pay interest on the U.S. debt to the

banking families that own the International Monetary Fund (IMF): “With

two-thirds of everyone’s personal income taxes wasted or not

collected, 100 percent of what is collected is absorbed solely by

interest on the Federal debt and by Federal Government contributions

to transfer payments. In other words, all individual income tax

revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services which

taxpayers expect from their Government.” J. Peter Grace, Cover

letter, President’s Private Sector Report on Cost Control, January 12,

1984. Peter Grace was considered the Warren Buffett of his time, and

the Grace Commission Report received widespread media attention as the

gospel of Reagan’s so-called tax system overhaul.)

(http://www.freecanadian.net/articles/grace.html or

http://www.uhuh.com/taxstuff/gracecom.htm )

– “31 CFR 103.11” (Promissory note is defined as a “monetary

instrument:” “(u) Monetary instruments…Monetary instruments

include…All negotiable instruments (including personal checks,

business checks, official bank checks, cashier’s checks, third-party

checks, promissory notes (as that term is defined in the Uniform

Commercial Code), and money orders) that are either in bearer form,

endorsed without restriction, made out to a fictitious payee (for the

purposes of Sec. 103.23), or otherwise in such form that title thereto

passes upon delivery.”)

(http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/cfr_2008/julqtr/31cfr103.11.htm or


– “NYUCC 3-104” (Promissory note is defined as a “negotiable

instrument:” “(1) Any writing to be a negotiable instrument within

this Article must (a) be signed by the maker or drawer; and (b)

contain an unconditional promise or order to pay a sum certain

in money and no other promise, order, obligation or power given by

the maker or drawer except as authorized by this Article; and (c)

be payable on demand or at a definite time; and (d) be payable to

order or to bearer. (2) A writing which complies with the

requirements of this section is (a) a “draft” (“bill of exchange”) if

it is an order; (b) a “check” if it is a draft drawn on a bank and

payable on demand; (c) a “certificate of deposit” if it is an

acknowledgment by a bank of receipt of money with an engagement to

repay it; (d) a “note” if it is a promise other than a

certificate of deposit.) (www.law.cornell.edu/ucc/3/3-104.html)

– “Senate Report 93-549” (The United States has been under

dictatorial control since March 9, 1933. Report of the Special

Committee on the Termination of the National Emergency, Senate Report

93-549, War and Emergency Powers Acts, November 19, 1973. “Foreward:

Since March 9, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared

national emergency…These proclamations give force to 470 provisions of

Federal law. These hundreds of statutes delegate to the President

extraordinary powers, ordinarily exercised by the Congress, which

affect the lives of American citizens in a host of all-encompassing

manners. This vast range of powers, taken together, confer enough

authority to rule the country without reference to normal

Constitutional processes. Under the powers delegated by these

statutes, the President may: seize property; organize and control the

means of production; seize commodities; assign military forces abroad;

institute martial law; seize and control all transportation and

communication; regulate the operation of private enterprise; restrict

travel; and, in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of

all American citizens.”)

(http://www.scratchinpost.net/barefootbob/war_ep1.html )

– “Foley Brothers, Inc. v. Filardo, 336 U.S. 281 (1949).” (U.S.

regulations apply only within the U.S. territories and the District of

Columbia. “It is a well established principle of law that all federal

regulation applies only within the territorial jurisdiction of the

United States unless a contrary intent appears.”)

– “Caha v. US, 152 U.S. 211 (1894)” (U.S. regulations apply only

within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “The laws

of Congress in respect to those matters [outside of Constitutionally

delegated powers] do not extend into the territorial limits of the

states, but have force only in the District of Columbia, and other

places that are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the national


– “U.S. v. Spelar, 338 U.S. 217 at 222.” (U.S. regulations apply only

within the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia. “There is a

canon of legislative construction which teaches Congress that, unless

a contrary intent appears [legislation] is meant to apply only within

the territorial jurisdiction of the United States.”)

– “Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901).” (Purportedly decided if

the constitution applies to U.S. territories. In actuality, unleashed

the great fraud of unlimited statutory power misapplied throughout the

continental united States of America. Dissenting opinion of Justice

Marshall Harlan. “…two national governments, one to be maintained

under the Constitution, with all its restrictions, the other to be

maintained by Congress outside and independently of that instrument,

by exercising such powers as other nations of the earth are accustomed

to…a radical and mischievous change in our system of government will

result…We will, in that event, pass from the era of constitutional

liberty guarded and protected by a written constitution into an era of

legislative absolutism…It will be an evil day for American liberty if

the theory of a government outside the supreme law of the land finds

lodgment in our constitutional jurisprudence.” In other words, a

genuine de jure united States of America congress is always bound to

enact laws within the jurisdiction of the constitution. He held tyo

the obvious truth that congress does not exist, let alone have powers,

outside the constitution. Harlan said, “This nation is under the

control of a written constitution, the supreme law of the land and the

only source of the powers which our government, or any branch or

officer of it, may exert at any time or at any place.”)

– Section 802, Patriot Act. (Defining the People as terrorists.

Defining terrorism as a maritime event. Excluding private meetings on

the land from terrorism: “(5) the term `domestic terrorism’ means

activities that–(A) involve acts dangerous to human life that are a

violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State;

(B) appear to be intended– (i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian

population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by

intimidation or coercion; or (iii) to affect the conduct of a

government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping; and (C)

occur primarily within the territorial jurisdiction of the United

States.”) (http://www.ratical.org/ratville/CAH/Section802.html)


See more