Net-profits tax from two years ago gaining favor
June 6, 2003
A tax plan similar to the net-profits tax proposed by Nevada teachers two years ago was presented to lawmakers Thursday.
The plan would generate up to $250 million a year and, with other revenue proposals generally supported by lawmakers, raise enough to cover the $860 million needed to balance the budget.
The 2001 Legislature refused to discuss a net-profits tax. Now, in the face of major opposition to nearly every other broad-based business tax proposal, a number of lawmakers are saying it doesn’t look that bad.
“This could be the basis of a compromise,” said Assemblywoman Sheila Leslie, D-Reno.
Chris Giunchigliani, D-Las Vegas, said she supported the idea two years ago and still thinks it’s a good one.
“It’s time to make some decisions. Net profits has been around. It’s in 47 states. Business is comfortable with it,” she said.
Recommended Stories For You
Lawmakers need two-thirds of each house to pass a tax plan.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Raggio, R-Reno, said he and Speaker Richard Perkins, D-Henderson, asked lobbyists Sam McMullen representing business and Billy Vassiliadis representing gaming to try to hammer out an agreement based on a net-profits tax in hopes of avoiding another deadlock.
“We could sit here forever,” Raggio said. “The other house took the payroll tax off the table and we took the gross-receipts tax off the table, so we were heading for an impasse again.”
With the help of Jeremy Aguerro, analyst for the Governor’s Task Force on Tax Policy, they developed a tax of 3 percent of profits up to $50,000, 5 percent for profits up to $100,000 a year and 7 percent for all profits above that.
The maximum any business would have to pay is a quarter-percent of its gross receipts. The minimum was set by imposing a franchise fee on all businesses ranging from nothing for companies with less than $20,000 a year to $10,000 for those grossing more than $10 million.
Businesses paying industry-specific taxes, including gaming and insurance, would be exempted from double taxation on those parts of their business.
Aguerro said the franchise portion of the tax could be implemented quickly — generating up to $102 million. He said the net-profits portion of the plan would take a year or more to implement.
Assembly Minority Leader Lynn Hettrick, R-Gardnerville, said the plan would allow the biggest businesses to pay a lower percentage of their total than small businesses.
Sen. Bernice Mathews, D-Sparks, said she wouldn’t support the idea because it’s too complicated to absorb and understand with just one day to go in a special session of the Legislature, called after lawmakers failed to agree on a tax plan by Tuesday’s 1 a.m. deadline.
Assemblywoman Dawn Gibbons, R-Reno, made a similar comment but agreed to consider the proposal today.
Lawmakers must raise about $860 million in new revenues over the next two years to balance the budget they approved in the session’s waning minutes.
Both committees will take a thorough look at the proposal this morning — the day Gov. Kenny Guinn has set as the deadline for the special session to complete its work.
Beyond the net-profits tax, the Senate and Assembly agreed to reduce collection allowances cigarette, liquor and sales tax retailers get for collecting taxes. Together, those changes would raise about $25 million a year.
Both agreed to impose a 10 percent tax on live entertainment in the state, generating $47.9 million next year and more than $80 million a year once fully implemented.
They also agreed to a version of an annual business license fee — the Senate selecting $50 and raising about $12 million a year.
Both houses agreed cigarette and liquor taxes should increase.
For restricted slot machine fees, both houses approved a 33 percent increase to raise some $2.3 million a year.
The Senate and Assembly also agreed to a real-estate transfer tax recommended by Hettrick who said eliminating the proposed $100,000 exemption would simplify collections. He said the rate could be cut from $1.88 to $1.10 for every $500 of value and still more than double the amount of revenue to $50 million a year. He said the reason is the large number of property transfers and sales under $100,000 — many of them timeshares.
The subject of general gaming taxes and several other revenue sources are still on the table.
Trending In: Local
- Chicago-flavor restaurant coming to Carson City
- NV Energy CEO criticizes Energy Choice amendment
- 2018 Primary Election guide: Justice of the Supreme Court, Seat C
- Cardoza pleads guilty to second-degree murder in 2013 Carson City case
- Arrest for using cell phone while driving, says Carson City Sheriff’s Office