If verified fact that refutes the selected garbage spewed by Guy Farmer is as ludicrous as he seems to believe, why is such a good laugh for its readers so religiously withheld from publication on the editorial page of the Appeal?
What gives a retiree from a minor government position, which in recent decades requires personal mediocrity and mindless obedience, sanction to publish without contradiction? A prime example is "No Conspiracy, no news out of Waco investigation" by Guy Farmer (Nevada Appeal, July 30, 2000) on an "official" government conclusion about the WACO incident that is totally at variance with that of the majority of the populace, many of whom are better and more honestly informed and immeasurably brighter than he? RICHARD BENTINCK
Carson City
Comments
Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.
Sign in to comment