Lawmakers debate death penalty moratorium

  • Discuss Comment, Blog about
  • Print Friendly and PDF

(AP) " A bill debated Tuesday by Nevada lawmakers would impose a moratorium on capital punishment in Nevada until mid-2011, while a study is done on the cost of the death penalty.

Assemblyman Bernie Anderson, chief sponsor of AB190, said it's time to "determine if we are simply throwing away money."

AB190, discussed in the Assembly Committee on Elections, Procedures, Ethics and Constitutional Amendments, wouldn't prohibit prosecutors from seeking a death sentence, but would prohibit the state from carrying out executions while the moratorium is in effect.

Several studies have said that the cost of capital punishment is greater than the cost of life in prison without parole. Some estimates are that prosecution and appeals for death penalty cases amount to $3 million to $4 million per inmate " about three times the cost of life-in-prison sentences.

"It's simply not a cost-effective way to do business," said Michael Pescetta, an assistant federal defender.

"Death penalty cases cost more because the U.S. Supreme Court has said death is different," Clark County District Judge Stephen Dahl said, adding that death penalty cases require a team approach, with more lawyers and steps in the process.

Although the bill doesn't seek to end the death penalty, the committee heard testimony on why many people oppose capital punishment.

Besides the fiscal impact to the state, Anderson said he has personal reasons to oppose the death penalty. After a member of his family was murdered, the accused was charged with the death penalty, and Anderson that had a dramatic effect on his family.

"The way a death tears apart a family is truly amazing," Anderson said.

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment