Trial begins in case of huge Santa Monica Bay DDT pile

  • Discuss Comment, Blog about
  • Print Friendly and PDF

LOS ANGELES - An ocean pollution trial a decade in the making began Tuesday with the federal government calling for more than $47 million to compensate for what they called the world's biggest pile of DDT, in the Santa Monica Bay.

Both sides had boxes and books of evidence stacked high in the courtroom of U.S. District Judge Manuel Real, who ruled earlier this month that the now-banned pesticide had harmed bald eagles and peregrine falcons on the Channel Islands.

Questions to be answered in the trial include how much Montrose Corp. and five related companies are to blame for that pollution - which took place from 1947 to 1971 - and how much the companies should pay to make up for it. The trial stems from a lawsuit filed in 1990.

Montrose's DDT manufacturing facility in Torrance released hundreds of pounds of the pesticide a day into the sewer system and ultimately the Palos Verdes Shelf of the Santa Monica Bay, Layn Phillips, an attorney representing the state of California, said in opening statements.

The pesticide, which was widely used in the United States until it was banned about 30 years ago, is linked to cancer and reproductive problems in humans and continues to contaminate fish and kill bald eagle chicks.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency named the contaminated area a Superfund site in 1996, and is experimenting with a dredging operation in which tons of silt from Long Beach Harbor is being poured into the waters off the Palos Verdes Peninsula to cover the DDT.

The company's lawyers acknowledge the dumping of DDT into the ocean, but argue those actions have not significantly harmed marine life, fishing or public health.

The injuries ''don't lead to any damages in the real world,'' attorney Harvey J. Wolkoff said. The DDT on the Palos Verdes Shelf is about 200 feet deep, and the white croakers that most commonly swim such depths are not common food for either other marine life or humans, he said.

He cited a 1990 state Department of Fish and Game study that found only four or five local fishermen caught white croakers, and the amount they caught - about 20,000 pounds - was worth only about $10,000.

But a 1997 study by the environmental group Heal the Bay found that white croaker was being sold in Asian markets throughout greater Los Angeles, and about 85 percent of it exceeded the EPA's recommended criteria for fish contamination.

Wolkoff also said the government was exaggerating the effect DDT has had on bald eagle and peregrine falcon populations in the Channel Islands. He said Montrose's production of DDT was ''not only entirely lawful, but welcome'' by the federal government - its biggest purchaser.

Justice Department attorney Steven O'Rourke said it will take an estimated $47 million to cover the cost of federal enforcement, assessment of the offshore pollution problem and the future restoration of Channel Islands peregrine falcon and bald eagle populations.

The government also wants Montrose to pay to restore fish populations harmed by DDT and make up for lost natural resources in the area since the pollution began in 1947. O'Rourke said an earlier ruling prevented him from specifying a dollar amount for those two items.

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment